ABC’s decision to step down from hosting debates raises an important question about the future of political discourse: Is fact-checking dead? In an era where truth is increasingly seen as subjective and “alternative facts” reign supreme, networks like ABC, which try to hold candidates accountable in real-time, are finding themselves on the losing end of the ratings battle.
For many, ABC’s exit marks the end of an era. It was one of the few networks that still clung to the notion that debates should serve as a forum for truth and accountability. But as the 2024 election unfolds, it’s becoming clear that voters aren’t looking for a debate—they’re looking for a showdown. And when it comes to high-stakes political theater, fact-checking is just an unwelcome distraction.
ABC, in its parting words, seemed to recognize this shift. “We tried,” the spokesperson said. “We really did. But at the end of the day, people want drama, not details. So, we’re handing the reins over to Fox, where the only fact that matters is how high the ratings are.”
With Fox News now in charge, it’s safe to say that the next debate will be less about truth and more about keeping viewers entertained. Expect fireworks, wild accusations, and perhaps even a few surprise celebrity moderators (rumors are already swirling that Tucker Carlson has reached out to Kanye West for a guest appearance).
But for those hoping for a serious, substantive debate? Well, you might want to look elsewhere—or invest in some popcorn. Because if Fox’s track record is anything to go by, the next debate is shaping up to be less of a discussion and more of a three-ring circus.
In the meantime, ABC’s exit has left many wondering whether any network is willing to step up and bring accountability back to the debate stage. But in a world where spectacle trumps substance, that may be a losing battle. For now, it seems that fact-checking, like ABC’s debate hosting career, is becoming a relic of the past.
So buckle up, America. The debates are only going to get wilder from here.
